“CFP greatly simplifies the complex issue of chemicals management,” remarked Monica Nakielski of Partners HealthCare. “We now have a tool that is available for plugging into purchasing decisions.”
“Not only does the CFP promote chemicals management that better protects human health and the environment, it also creates long-term value for companies and shareholders by enhancing brand reputation, increasing sales, promoting innovative products, increasing supply chain reliability, and avoiding the high costs of chemical crises,” said Mary Ellen Leciejewski of Dignity Health.
“We see the Chemical Footprint Project enabling us to quickly recognize and reward suppliers for doing what matters most to us in health care, which is implementing systems to ensure their products and supply chains use safe and healthy chemical ingredients,” explained Vanessa Lochner of Kaiser Permanente.
Issues for Health Care and Government
- Workers, patients, and people in general want products that are safer and healthier. Their expectation is that products will not contain chemicals harmful to themselves and the environment.
- Toxic chemicals cause health related diseases:
- 3% of developmental disabilities
- 5% of childhood cancer
- 10% of diabetes, Parkinson’s Disease, and neuro-developmental disabilities
- 10% of children’s neurobehavioral disorders
- 30% of childhood asthma
- Until CFP, health care and government purchasers lacked the means to evaluate how their suppliers manage chemical risks.
Value for Health Care and Government
- Creates a clear, common logic for evaluating corporate chemical management performance.
- Provides easy to use results: CFP will provide institutional purchasers with data that readily enables comparisons of suppliers on their corporate-wide chemical footprint. For contracts that can include tens if not hundreds of products, CFP enables quick benchmarking of supplier performance in chemicals management.
- Measures supplier progress on chemicals performance: the data on which the easy to use CFP results rests arise from an in-depth assessment of suppliers’ policies and practices, specifically:
- Management Strategy: corporate policies for chemicals management.
- Chemical Inventory: what suppliers know about chemicals in products and manufacturing.
- Progress Measurement: how suppliers assess chemicals, whether they select safer alternatives, and their overall progress in reducing toxic chemical use.
- Public Disclosure: how much information suppliers release to the public about chemicals in their products and their overall chemicals management practices.
- Fills a critical missing gap in sustainability data: the CFP data will enable purchasers to evaluate companies on all their key sustainability metrics, including chemicals and health.
- Empowers purchasers to request chemical footprint data from suppliers.
- Identifies opportunities for improving supplier performance: purchaser requests for chemical footprint data can prompt suppliers to improve their chemical management policies and practices.
- Enables purchasers to recognize and reward suppliers for doing well.
The Chemical Footprint Project gives companies across all industries tools to evaluate their progress in reducing Chemicals of High Concern and proactively identify opportunities for further action,
- Joyce Taylor, Hewlett-Packard Company
The Chemical Footprint Project provides an independent, third party assessment tool that will help companies to think about how to fully integrate their policies into procedures and vice-versa.
- Jane Abernethy, Humanscale
CFP greatly simplifies the complex issue of chemicals management. We now have a tool that is available for plugging into purchasing decisions.
- Monica Nakielski, Partners HealthCare
Companies need to know the chemicals in their products and supply chains, and be able to benchmark their performance. CFP offers a new and welcomed option for companies to make progress in these efforts.
- Sarah Vogel, Environmental Defense Fund
CFP provides the definitive tool for measuring overall corporate chemical management performance. We look forward to its widespread use in the furnishings sector where a credible, third party benchmarking of chemical performance is missing, yet needed.