The Technical Committee served as an ad hoc group that advised the development of the 2014 pilot version of the Chemical Footprint Project Survey.
Sara Cederberg, U.S. Green Building Council
Beth Eckl, Practice Greenhealth
Sonja Haider, ChemSec
Barbara Kyle, Electronics Takeback Coalition
Rich Liroff, Investor Environmental Health Network
Brian Martin, Seagate
Roger McFadden, McFadden and Associates, LLC.
Joe Rinkevich, Scivera
Joyce Taylor, HP, Inc.
Howard Williams, Construction Specialties, Inc.
Hazardous chemicals “present reputational, regulatory, and reformulation risks across a broad range of industry sectors. Investors need to understand how companies are meaningfully managing these risks.”
- Susan Baker, Trillium Asset Management, LLC
The Chemical Footprint Project provides an independent, third party assessment tool that will help companies to think about how to fully integrate their policies into procedures and vice-versa.
- Jane Abernethy, Humanscale
CFP is a market differentiator and provides a competitive advantage for business leaders. This new tool will add a level of transparency and help companies mitigate reputational and regulatory risks and exploit opportunities afforded by moving to safer chemicals.
- Roger McFadden, Staples, Inc.
We see the Chemical Footprint Project enabling us to quickly recognize and reward suppliers for doing what matters most to us in health care, which is implementing systems to ensure their products and supply chains use safe and healthy chemical ingredients
- Vanessa Lochner , Kaiser Permanente
The Investor Environmental Health Network welcomes the launch of the Chemical Footprint Project. For too long chemicals and health have been missing pieces in Environmental Social Governance (ESG) assessments. Now we have a tool that investors can use to fill in this critical information.